Alarm bells: the prevention mechanism of job crimes in the field of agricultural machinery subsidies is to be improved

The People's Court of Yanliang District directly tried the first case of agricultural machinery subsidy fraud in Shaanxi Province

On August 4th, the People’s Court of Yanliang District conducted a live broadcast of the first case of agricultural machinery subsidy fraud in Shaanxi Province. Zhang is an individual industrial and commercial household operating a farm machinery market. In 2012, two agricultural cooperatives were registered. In May 2013, Zhang wanted to operate a farm sprayer and filed a plan for the purchase of agricultural machinery with the agricultural machinery management station of Yanliang District in the name of a cooperative.

Alarm bells: the prevention mechanism of job crimes in the field of agricultural machinery subsidies is to be improved

One of the links to apply for subsidies is to upload the invoice for the purchase of agricultural machinery to the agricultural machinery management station. If the invoice price is not lower than the winning bid price of the agricultural machinery subsidized appliance, the national agricultural machinery subsidy will be obtained. The purchase price negotiated by Zhang and the sales company is lower than the subsidized bid price of the agricultural machinery. In order to obtain the national agricultural machinery subsidy, Zhang asked the sales company to invoice for it. In this way, during the period from June 2013 to May 2014, Zhang purchased a large number of agricultural sprayers and defrauded the agricultural machinery subsidy of 610,000 yuan. The case was not decided in court.

Daqing, Heilongjiang: fraudulent use of identity fraud to get subsidies

This is a manager of a seed industry company. It is not good to plan the development of the company. It is actually focused on the national agricultural machinery subsidy. It borrows the identity card of others to buy a corn harvester and defrauds the subsidy of more than 240,000 yuan. Recently, the procuratorate of Longfeng District, Daqing City, Heilongjiang Province filed a public prosecution. The court sentenced Zhang Shiyi to three years in prison for a three-year suspended sentence and a fine of 30,000 yuan.

Zhang Shiyi, 56, is the manager of a seed company in Daqing City. In 2011, when he bought agricultural machinery for enterprises, he started the idea of ​​subsidizing the national agricultural machinery. He borrowed the ID cards of Sanmou, Wumou, Xu and others to pay the Daqing City Agricultural Machinery Bureau the name of the corn harvester. The subsidy procedures were processed. After the approval, Zhang Shiyi defrauded the national agricultural machinery subsidy of more than 240,000 yuan. Later, he used this model to purchase three self-propelled combine harvesters for his company.

In July 2015, Zhang Shiyi’s deception was discovered because of a case of dereliction of duty. In September of that year, Zhang Shiyi surrendered to the procuratorate and repaid the amount of the fraud.

Fraud: false purchase of agricultural machinery to defraud the subsidy of 2.57 million

Recently, the Cui Mou fraudulent agricultural machinery purchase subsidy case of Tunxi Town, Tunxi County, transferred by the Nanjing Special Office of the National Audit Office, was pronounced in the first instance of the Suxi County Court. The court sentenced Cui to a one-year imprisonment, suspended for two years, and fined 51,000 yuan (paid).

The court found that in September 2012, the defendant Cui used the identity information of the company and purchased the invoice to fictionalize the sales record of a Dongfeng 900 wheeled tractor, and applied for the purchase of the national agricultural machinery using the qualification of the sales department of Suixi County Agricultural Machinery. Subsidies, defrauding the subsidy of 25,700 yuan, the aircraft was not actually sold. After the tractor was actually sold in 2013 to the villager Yang of Guangming Village, Hancun Town, Tunxi County, Yang applied for a subsidy of 25,000 yuan for agricultural machinery. On October 14, 2015, Cui Mou will refund the agricultural machinery purchase subsidy of 25,700 yuan to be refunded. On October 19 of the same year, he took the initiative to the Suxi County Public Security Bureau to surrender the case and truthfully confess the above facts.

The court held that the defendant Cui Mou took the method of fictional facts and concealing the truth for the purpose of illegal possession, and defrauded the state agricultural machinery purchase subsidies. The amount was large, and his behavior constituted fraud. The public prosecutor accused him of being convicted. Cui Mou took the initiative to surrender, truthfully confessing his crimes, surrendered himself, and can be punished lightly. Based on his criminal circumstances and performance of penitence, he made the above judgment according to law.

Xinjiang Hami, a man defrauded the agricultural machinery subsidy of 370,000 yuan was sentenced to four and a half years

Recently, Hami's man Liu took advantage of the cheap, defrauded the state agricultural machinery purchase subsidy of 371,500 yuan, was sentenced to four years and six months in prison by the Hami City People's Court, and fined RMB 40,000.

The Hami City People's Court held that Liu was detained for the purpose of illegal possession and defrauded the state agricultural machinery purchase subsidy of 371,250 yuan in the name of farmers. The amount of the subsidy was huge, and his behavior constituted a crime of fraud, which should be more than three years and more than ten years. The following sentence is imposed within the scope of the sentence.

In order to obtain the subsidy for the purchase of the national agricultural machinery, Liu gave the state staff a cash of RMB 10,000. His behavior has constituted a crime of bribery, and he should be punished according to law. In view of the fact that Liu actually purchased the roller blind machine for the production and operation of the greenhouse, and returned all the money after the crime, the first offender was guilty of confession in court and had a performance of repentance. According to the above circumstances, the court gave him a lighter punishment when he was sentenced. In accordance with the law, the defendant Liu was convicted of fraud, sentenced to four years and six months in prison, and fined RMB 40,000.